Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | joseda-hg's commentslogin

For those not in the know

"I'm an egotistical bastard, and I name all my projects after myself. First Linux, now git." - Linus Torvalds

Git

noun - derogatory

An unpleasant or contemptible person (typically used of a man).


I'd guess PowerPivot and PowerQuery

You'd think it's third party the way it locks up a file or makes it so you can't basic things like interacting with filters


I mean, there's still quite a number of resources on the surface, plenty just sit there because the ratio of setup cost / profit isn't there

The demand a smaller civilization would have should be quite less significant than what we currently have, so it stands to reason it would make sense for them to use those


Even knowing the broad concepts of Crop Rotation, Germ theory, or Computation, means that you shouldn't take that long to get back to an advanced stage, you probably won't actually get to whatever SOTA you had on those fields for a long time, but knowing where to look is quite significant in cutting wasted time


Which incentivizes people to hold on to exploits for as long as possible, ideally past the console life cycle, just to make sure it can be used, which already is a thing


I might be interpreting wrong, but doesn't IPv6 also have a "implicit bridge" for IPv4?


If it does that's great, but why couldn't I connect to IPv6-only services back when my ISP was IPv4 only?


It's one way, v6 is aware of v4, but not the other way around


It's not automatic, there were many proposed and utilized mechanisms for autodetecting translation servers and so on. By now though, if you want IPv6, you order real IPv6, and don't need some translation.


Not the user you're responding to, but I feel like I do something similar

I describe what I want roughly on the level I could still code it by hand, to the level of telling Claude to create specific methods, functions and classes (And reminding it to use them, because models love pointless repetition)

Is it faster? Sure, being this specific has the added benefit of greatly reduced hallucinations (Still, depends on the model, Gemini is still more prone to want to do more things, even when uncalled for)

I also don't need to fine comb everything, Logic and interaction I'll check, but basic everyday stuff is usually already pretty well explained in the repo and the model usually picks up on it


> Lots of songs have, like, "forced" slang or even changes in pronunciation or syllable stress to meet the constraints of the lyrics.

I agree. I’d be wary of this as a beginner, but when you get more advanced, it becomes helpful in untangling your hearing from the isolated, intentionally clean and slowed-down setting of a class.

People don’t actually talk like that. Some slur their speech, others have a heavy accent, and others just place emphasis wherever they feel like it. Some kinds of music* work well for giving you an ear for the changes that matter (And even with all the changes, natives still are able to understand most music, so it is a skill to learn).

* I love me some guturals in my music, but it's probably not the best way to train your ear for every day conversation


It (CC) does have a /models command, you can still decide to route everything to Opus if you just want to burn tokens I guess it's not default so most wouldn't, but still, people willing to go to a third party client are more likely that kind of power user anyway

They still have the total consumption under their control (*bar prompt caching and other specific optimizations) where in the past they even had different quotas per model, it shouldn't cost them more money, just be a worse/different service I guess


> it shouldn't cost them more money

As things are currently, better models mean bigger models that take more storage+RAM+CPU, or just spend more time processing a request. All this translates to higher costs, and may be mitigated by particular configs triggered by knowledge that a given client, providing particular guarantees, is on the other side.


That’s kind of the point. Even if users can choose which model to use (and apparently the default is the largest one), they could still say (For roughly the same cost): your Opus quota is X, your Haiku quota is Y, go ham. We’ll throttle you when you hit the limit.


But they don't want the subscription to be quota'd like that. The API automatically does that though, as different models use different amounts of tokens when generating responses, and the billing is per token. And quite literally is having the user account for the actual costs of usage, which is the thing said users are trying to avoid, on their own terms, and getting upset about when they aren't.


> It (CC) does have a /models command, you can still decide to route everything to Opus if you just want to burn tokens I guess it's not default so most wouldn't

Opus is claude code's default model as of sometime recently (around Opus 4.6?)


The constraints being different already make the replacement tangibly different

Maybe it will kill the veil of (perceived) anonimity which tangibly changes how people behave, or maybe the filter will be monetary and the filter will just affect the underclass shifting whatever discourse will be had

We can't act like whatever replaces the current web won't be different, because then there's no reason to change at all


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: