Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is the mainstream view.

The alternative view is that FDR made the Great Depression great, with arbitrary orders like NIRA and attacks on business. He ruled for four terms and the Depression coincidentally lifted after his death. Out of necessity business was given a freeer hand during the war, sort of like Lenin's NEP in the 1920s. With FDR's death that free hand continued. Read "The Forgotten Man" or John T. Flynn if interested in this point of view.

  By the middle of his second term, much criticism of   
  Roosevelt centered on fears that he was heading toward a 
  dictatorship, by attempting to seize control of the 
  Supreme Court in the Court-packing incident of 1937, 
  attempting to eliminate dissent within the Democratic 
  party in the South during the 1938 elections, and by 
  breaking the tradition established by George Washington 
  of not seeking a third term when he again ran for re- 
  election in 1940. As two historians explain, "In 1940, 
  with the two-term issue as a weapon, anti-New Dealers...
  argued that the time had come to disarm the "dictator" 
  and to dismantle the machinery."[1] These criticisms 
  largely ended after the Attack on Pearl Harbor.
In key respects, Pearl Harbor was to FDR what 9/11 was to Bush. It shut down criticism and gave him two terms.

Because victors write history, we need to be skeptical of presidents surrounded by war propaganda, whether Bush or Obama or FDR. Did a president lead us through war and depression? Or did he get us into war and turn an ordinary recession into a depression?



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: