Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
tptacek
on June 12, 2012
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Flame is Lame
That's an awfully baroque government backdoor --- a misconfigured X.509 attribute on a certificate that turns out to be signed with a hash for which controlled collisions turn out to be feasible.
aparadja
on June 12, 2012
[–]
Well, it does have a lot more plausible deniability than a straightforward backdoor. Which, of course, proves absolutely nothing.
tptacek
on June 12, 2012
|
parent
[–]
So that makes Pinkie Pie's 92-step Chrome exploit especially likely to be a backdoor, then? :)
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: