Interesting article. Largely bullshit, I suspect, but an interesting read nonetheless.
That being said, I found the article obnoxious. The authors are hoping that, by presenting their claims as "politically incorrect truths," anyone skeptical of their conclusions for methodological reasons (lack of evidence, begging the question, fundamental attribution error, bias blind spot, cum hoc ergo propter hoc, selection bias, etc.) will simply be dismissed as not being able to deal with their edgy, courageously neutral, politically incorrect "truths."
That being said, I found the article obnoxious. The authors are hoping that, by presenting their claims as "politically incorrect truths," anyone skeptical of their conclusions for methodological reasons (lack of evidence, begging the question, fundamental attribution error, bias blind spot, cum hoc ergo propter hoc, selection bias, etc.) will simply be dismissed as not being able to deal with their edgy, courageously neutral, politically incorrect "truths."