Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't think that becoming dependent on a particular product, service, or supplier makes it "not a free market."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_market#Overview

Adam Smith believed that an economy should be free of monopoly rents

If I can keep you from switching lawyers, if I can keep you from interviewing other lawyers, if I know your choice is not "lawyer or no lawyer", but "which lawyer", then I can keep my prices artificially (not a free market) high.


How do you distinguish between "keeping you from switching" and "it being inherently difficult to switch?" If you buy an expensive car that only runs on expensive and rare fuel (thereby restricting your choice in fuels), is the free market somehow violated? If you buy a Gillette razor that only works with Gillette blade cartridges, is the free market violated? I find the distinction rather fuzzy.


Erm, how is that different than food? You can't choose not to buy food, so would you also consider that not to be a free market?


You can grow it or hunt it.

[edit] Not that I think that the global market for food to be a free market.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: